Lead in Paint: A Disturbing 45% False Negative Rate Claim for an L Shell XRF
Study from Columbia University scientists flags issues with L-Shell XRF and shows urgent need for EPA and HUD to modernize methodology to evaluate lead testing tools.
Study from Columbia University scientists flags issues with L-Shell XRF and shows urgent need for EPA and HUD to modernize methodology to evaluate lead testing tools.
Proposed action levels are inconsistent with agency’s Closer to Zero criteria.
EPA needs to modernize training and certification rules for certified inspectors, risk assessors, project designers, abatement supervisors and workers.
If homesellers fail to disclose LSLs, the buyer likely to recover replacement costs.
CDC should withdraw its statement and look to EPA’s terminology for dust-lead.
New action levels limits will be implemented in 2028
Study enables utilities to avoid telling customers that a service line is “Nonlead” when it is a lead service line.
Agency rejected Lowe’s Home Centers requirement to notify families where past violations occurred or explicitly offer dust clearance testing to new customers.
The Baby Food Safety Act of 2026 empowers FDA without preempting state laws.
Refined tools could strengthen Renovation, Repair and Painting’s LSWPs to require dust-lead clearance for projects not likely to meet the dust-lead action level.
